EI / SCOPUS / CSCD 收录

中文核心期刊

BAI Peirui, ZHAO Qi, CAO Maoyong, HAN Yan. Comparison of two field simulation models of two-dimensional ultrasound transducer arrays in time domain[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2011, 36(5): 506-512. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2011.05.006
Citation: BAI Peirui, ZHAO Qi, CAO Maoyong, HAN Yan. Comparison of two field simulation models of two-dimensional ultrasound transducer arrays in time domain[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2011, 36(5): 506-512. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2011.05.006

Comparison of two field simulation models of two-dimensional ultrasound transducer arrays in time domain

More Information
  • PACS: 
    • 43.30  (Underwater sound)
    • 43.60  (Acoustic signal processing)
  • Received Date: March 06, 2010
  • Revised Date: September 06, 2010
  • Available Online: July 05, 2022
  • Simulation experiments were designed to compare the segmented-element spatial impulse response model and the discrete point-matrix model for acoustic field calculation of two-dimensional transducer array e.g. xMATRIX transducer. Computation ac- curacy, efficiency, influential parameters and suitable application of the two models were analyzed and compared. The experimental results demonstrated that the segmented-element spatial impulse response model is fast and accurate, and it is sensitive to element size, pitch, focus depth and the ratio between height and width of elements. The segmented-element spatial impulse response model is a popular tool to simulate ultrasonic filed in homogeneous medium. The discrete point-matrix model is computed costly when applying to two-dimensional transducer array. Its accuracy is inferior to the segmented-element spatial impulse response model. The discrete point-matrix model depends heavily on the number of elements and their represented points. However, it is convenient to simulate the filed of arbitrarily shaped ultrasound transducer array in inhomogeneous medium. With the same array aperture and excited impulse, accuracy of the segmented-element spatial impulse response model is 6% higher than that of the discrete point-matrix model. Never- theless, its computation cost of two-dimensional and three-dimensional beam distribution is 20 and 1000 times lower than that of the discrete point-matrix model respectively.
  • Related Articles

    [1]MENG Weidong, YAN Shouguo, HUANG Juan, ZHANG Bixing. Design of ultrasonic array transducer for downhole forward-looking imaging[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2025, 50(1): 138-148. DOI: 10.12395/0371-0025.2023125
    [2]GENG Lin, ZHOU Lingzhi, CHEN Xingguo, XIE Feng. Iteratively reweighted time domain plane wave superposition method for reconstructing the non-stationary sound field[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2023, 48(2): 347-355. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2023.02.006
    [3]LIU Zhiying, YAN Shouguo, LIN Xinbo, HUANG Juan, ZHANG Bixing. The acoustic field characteristics of 1-3 piezocomposite two-dimensional cylindrical concave line-focusing transducer[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2022, 47(4): 503-510. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2022.04.012
    [4]SHI Huiyu, GUO Zhongcun, YAN Shouguo, ZHANG Bixing, HUANG Juan. Transient sound field simulation and defect location method of ultrasonic phased array in anisotropic welds[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2021, 46(3): 447-455. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2021.03.014
    [5]LIU Jianguo, ZHU Lingxiao, YAN Shenggang. The space-time coupling statistical model of reverberation from moving platforms[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2018, 43(4): 481-494. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2018.04.008
    [6]QIN Bo, MA Xiaochuan, Michael Zapf, YAN Shefeng, Nicole V.Ruiter. The time-window construction and data extraction for the data reduction of ultrasound computer tomography[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2018, 43(2): 189-201. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2018.02.008
    [7]JIAO Jingpin, YANG Sufang, HE Cunfu, WU Bin. Investigation of an ultrasonic array imaging method of phase weighting vector total focusing[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2017, 42(4): 485-494. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2017.04.014
    [8]SHAN Baohua, LI Dongsheng, GUO Jia, HUANG Mincong, DUAN Zhongdong. Radiation beam simulation of ultrasonic phased array based on a nonparaxial multi-Gaussian beam model with double interfaces[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2017, 42(4): 457-464. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2017.04.011
    [9]DONG Ming, MA Hongwei, ZHANG Guangming, CHEN Yuan, ZHANG Xuhui, CAO Xiangang. A model for determining electromechanical response profile of ultrasonic transducers and ultrasonic transient echo[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2017, 42(4): 403-410. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2017.04.003
    [10]CAI Mingfei, SHI Fangfang, ZHANG Bixing. Multi-frequency pulse compression method based on ultrasonic array[J]. ACTA ACUSTICA, 2017, 42(2): 186-194. DOI: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2017.02.007

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (98) PDF downloads (21) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return