EI / SCOPUS / CSCD 收录

中文核心期刊

利用跟踪轨迹特征和SVDD-SVM联合分类器的水下慢速小目标分类方法

Underwater slowly-moving small target classification method using tracking trajectory features and SVDD-SVM classifier

  • 摘要: 针对蛙人、无人水下航行器(UUV)等慢速小目标分类识别所面临的小样本、类不平衡问题, 提出了利用轨迹特征、支持向量数据描述(SVDD)与支持向量机(SVM)的联合分类方法。该方法将水下慢速小目标类型简化为蛙人、UUV、其他3类, 利用跟踪轨迹特征设计多维特征量, 构建SVDD-SVM联合分类器获得分类结果。具体为, 针对小样本问题, 采用参数维度小、训练数据量要求低的SVDD、SVM作为分类器的基本单元。针对类不平衡问题, 使用2个并联的单分类SVDD和1个与两者串联的二分类SVM设计联合分类器, 同时为联合分类器的输出设计投票机制保证分类结果的稳健性。实测数据处理结果表明, 所提SVDD-SVM联合分类器对蛙人目标的平均召回率可达86%, 平均精确率可达87%; 对UUV目标的平均召回率可达85%, 平均精确率可达86%。所提方法在小样本、类不平衡条件下具有优于传统方法的分类准确性和稳健性。

     

    Abstract: The classification of underwater small targets such as frogmen and unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) is a typical small-sample-size and class-imbalanced problem. To solve this problem, a joint classification method is proposed which uses the tracking trajectory features, the support vector data description (SVDD) and the support vector machine (SVM). The proposed method transforms the underwater small target recognition problem to be a classification one, where only three classes including “frogman”, “UUV” and “others” are considered. It makes use of the feature differences produced by the moving processes of different targets, and design a joint classifier called SVDD-SVM to realize classification. Specifically, to solve the small-sample-size problem, it chooses SVDD and SVM having a small number of parameters and requiring small-size training data as the basic unit of the classifier. To solve the class-imbalanced problem, it uses two one-class SVDDs and one two-class SVM to construct SVDD-SVM. The two SVDDs are placed in parallel, and the SVM is placed right after them. Meanwhile, a voting mechanism is designed to obtain the final outputted results of SVDD-SVM. A small-size set of real data is used to verify the classification performance of the proposed SVDD-SVM. The proposed SVDD-SVM method has an averaged recall rate of 86% and an averaged precision rate of 87% for frogmen, an averaged recall rate of 85% and an averaged precision rate of 86% for UUVs, showing a higher accuracy and more robust performance than the traditional methods considered in this paper.

     

/

返回文章
返回